|
 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison | |||||
Subject of comparison |
IML |
Shrink- Sleeve |
Printing |
||
| 1. | Eviroment friendly-Easy to Recycle | Yes |
No - Requires second oeration to separate sleeve from container | Yes | |
| 2. | Scope for Exports | Very High-as visually more appealing & easily recyclable, hence better scope for export to developed contries. | Almost Nil-though it has visual appeal, requires 2nd operation for recycling & has high chances of microbial contamination. | Limited scope-as visual appeal is limited due to limitations of dry of dry offset printing process. | |
| 3. | Visual appeal | Excellent | Moderate | Good- Depending on design. | |
| 4. | Mold-Decoration | No limitations- All type of printing can be achieved, on all surfaces of the container | Limitations-minimal due to Roto-Gravier Printing process | Limitations-due to unavailability of half-tone printing | |
| 5. | Production Quantity | High | Low-due to manual operations | High | |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|